Post by sonterra on Sept 15, 2010 11:45:27 GMT -5
Hello All,
What are some of the things you have seen in puppy contracts? What will you sign your name to, and what won't you sign your name to?
I have seen several issues come up lately - both for show and working people.
Years ago I had a bouvier that I showed to a conformation championship and I had also put a CD on her. At 2 years old when I xray'd her hips she was moderately dysplastic. I sent an email to the breeder (also a co-owner and friend or so I thought) letting her know the dog was dysplastic and that I was spaying her. The breeder was adamant the dog NOT be spayed and at the end threatened to sue me if I did spay her. I ended up sending the bitch back and she bred her on her next heat, and there is a god, because 12 puppies were born dead and she never concieved again.
Now... when I bought the puppy, I got a 10 week old puppy, however I sent back a finished ch with an obedience title. Both the titles on the bitch were advertised on the litter announcement. I never recieved any money or compensation back, and first right of refusal was brought up.
If I spend $1500 on a puppy then spend time, effort and expense to make the dog into a titled/trained dog... is it fair that if life circumstances forced me to have to give the dog up... that I recieve nothing back and am forced to "give" the dog back to its breeder? Is it not at least fair to ask for the purchase price back? And what makes the puppy buyer unable to determine if a new home is a good one?
Now don't get me wrong I understand the reasoning behind the First Right of Refusal, and I understand a breeder taking responsiblity. But I think North American breeders have really twisted the legal intention behind the First Right of Refusal.
What do you think?
Tamara McIntosh
What are some of the things you have seen in puppy contracts? What will you sign your name to, and what won't you sign your name to?
I have seen several issues come up lately - both for show and working people.
Years ago I had a bouvier that I showed to a conformation championship and I had also put a CD on her. At 2 years old when I xray'd her hips she was moderately dysplastic. I sent an email to the breeder (also a co-owner and friend or so I thought) letting her know the dog was dysplastic and that I was spaying her. The breeder was adamant the dog NOT be spayed and at the end threatened to sue me if I did spay her. I ended up sending the bitch back and she bred her on her next heat, and there is a god, because 12 puppies were born dead and she never concieved again.
Now... when I bought the puppy, I got a 10 week old puppy, however I sent back a finished ch with an obedience title. Both the titles on the bitch were advertised on the litter announcement. I never recieved any money or compensation back, and first right of refusal was brought up.
If I spend $1500 on a puppy then spend time, effort and expense to make the dog into a titled/trained dog... is it fair that if life circumstances forced me to have to give the dog up... that I recieve nothing back and am forced to "give" the dog back to its breeder? Is it not at least fair to ask for the purchase price back? And what makes the puppy buyer unable to determine if a new home is a good one?
Now don't get me wrong I understand the reasoning behind the First Right of Refusal, and I understand a breeder taking responsiblity. But I think North American breeders have really twisted the legal intention behind the First Right of Refusal.
What do you think?
Tamara McIntosh